Blogs

Don't Fear the Firehose

Paul Armstrong, Kindred's Director of Social Media (http://www.kindredagency.com), on how to drink from the ever-changing social media / digital communication firehose. Paul has previous worked for MySpace Corporate Communications in Los Angeles and has devised digital strategies for Sony, Activision, Yahoo! properties amongst others.

This can't end well...can it? The Fire Brigade empty their hoses on privacy. [*Siren Noise*]   

Comments: 10   Add your comment

Picture 14
 

Privacy has been hot button since people started spelling social media with an 's' and an 'm'.  Most recently Facebook's Mark Zuckerburg (Facebook CEO, Founder and general bazillionaire) exclaimed privacy is no longer 'a social norm'.  Is he right?  Is he right for us +32 million status-updating UK oversharers or is has a major shift gone on and no-one pointing at it?  Regardless of whether you agree or disagree a traditional media hornets nest continues to rage.  So to honour/revel in the side-glances and puzzled looks, I felt it only right to let the expert firefighters tackle the blaze.  Privacy on Facebook and social media - does it give or does it take away?  The results surprised me a little, I expected much more backlash.  Perhaps we are all just sharing junkies or privacy was never really there to begin with.  What do you think?  Are they right?  Duke it out in the comments!!!

The Fire Brigade is recruiting!  Just email prweekblog@gmail.com for more details!

"..the more you interact and learn, the more sophisticated you can be when it comes to choosing what you share and who you share it with. [Opting out] can also mean missing out. From forgetting a party to loosing out financially it's surprising how little information you need to share online in order to participate." 
-
Beth Caroll / Ash Communications


"Privacy as it once was defined is moving toward extinction. But, that doesn't mean there is no more privacy.  Clearly, someone who lifestreams should expect less privacy than someone who mostly keeps to him/herself online."  
- Heather Whaling /
PRtini

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Social media generally has all the privacy settings one could ever need.  It's only when a candidate realises their job interviewer has googled them and seen all the lager-lager-lager piccies from their 18-30 holiday that the lightbulb tends to come on." 
Ben Casperz / Claremont Communications

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Society can (and in many cases already does) benefit from the sharing of information through social media, but before that can happen on a really major level individuals need to learn how to use social media to share safely, and it needs to be easier for them to do so."      
Ian McKee / McCluskey International  

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"A man who runs a business that decides arbitrarily what is private and what is not, and which reserves the right to change those rules whenever it wants, isn’t really speaking on behalf of society, he’s speaking on behalf of his customers and investors.

- John Ozimek / Mi liberty   

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"The idea that there is one standard for everyone is palpably wrong. For every Blippy extrovert there's a "hide my everything" introvert. The web prospers partly on the back of the ability to tailor experiences to personal desires - Zuckerberg would do well to remember that not everybody is him." 

- Elliot Reuben / Freelance Strategist

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

WANT TO JOIN THE FIRE BRIGADE?  It's free and easy... just like...something free and easy!  Email prweekblog@gmail.com for more details!

All Comments

Kristin Bleier, January 15, 2010

Anyone who engages in a social media environment needs to remember that their thoughts and ideas will not only be shared with friends but an open network as well. However, on the flip side, users should have the ability to control their privacy on/off switch.

 
John Ozimek, January 15, 2010

Ok, so I didn't expect my comment to sound as anti- as it maybe does! But as pro social media as I am, I do think that it's much harder to regain privacy once it's been lost than to protect it from the outset. Yes, much responsibility for the control of information rests with the individual, but we must also remember that information is power and competative advantage.

And I disagree with Ben above when he says that social media has all the privacy it needs. Clearly he's never tried to leave Facebook - a site which claims ownership and copyright over all information and content you post, and which does not delete closed profiles from its servers. The only way to guarantee privacy in many cases is to not engage in social media at all. What we need is a compromise that allows us to share, companies to learn from us, and that means we retain rights over the content we create.

That's where I believe social networking is headed - and I hope MArk Zuckerburg is one of the CEOs working on this - but we are not there yet by any means.

 
matt muir, January 15, 2010

If you need so-called ‘social media experts’ to tell you that perhaps putting photos of yourself doing crack cocaine with a bunch of under-age prostitutes up on the web isn’t a good idea, then I don’t think social media is the problem. Almost nothing on the internet is really private; learn what is and what isn’t, deal with it and move on.

 
Paul Armstrong, January 15, 2010

From working at MySpace I must admit I feel for Zuck.  It's never easy to have a site with +350 million people and have unanimous or well received decisions.  Someone will always be unhappy. There will always be detractors.

Facebook (and most social networks) have a history of privacy errors.  People react offline and online when their privacy is threatened.  The barrier to voice their opinions is so low these days that you can quickly get a groundswell of sentiment.

The issue is the privacy default stance.  People appear to feel like they are being tricked and that their data is leaking all over the place.  More education on how the data travels is necessary although as several people point out this is not in Facebook's (and their advertisers) best interests.

Share sensibly or you might just make Lamebook :  http://www.lamebook.com/

 
Jonathan Welsh, January 15, 2010

Matt, that was funny because it's true.

Paul, education is indeed needed as many Facebook users aren't 'tech geeks' and have no idea about the impact privacy could have on them in an employment situation, for example.

 
Mark Pack, January 15, 2010

People's attitudes are changing, but I've yet to meet anyone happy to give me the full transcript of all their conversations with their parents, partner or children.

Even the keenest 'sharing is the new default' advocates reserve a large degree of privacy for themselves.

 
Terry Frechette, January 15, 2010

Heaven. Because in hell there would be no off button. The great thing about social media is that I control what I want to find, and I am like the majority of people out there and know what to keep private. Self control people.

 
Jessica Payne, January 19, 2010

Privacy is debatable. I think the same people who worry about privacy are likely those who contemplate purchasing ID theft insurance...in the long run, whatever you put online has the potential for being found -- forever.  Ironically, the generations who grow up knowing nothing BUT socnets are currently those pasting up those not-so-HR-friendly holiday parties and benders. Still, something tells me we'll get to the point where everyone just shrugs and understands that the Web is public and should always be treated as such.

 
Petri Darby, January 22, 2010

Privacy? There are pictures online of me in my high school wrestling singlet from 20 years ago. There are pictures of me wearing tight-rolled jeans, white socks, black shoes, a motorcycle jacket, and a hat backwards. It is only a matter of time before those pictures taken of me on Bourbon Street, that I don't remember having taken, pop up. I am waiting for the blackmail letter. And I will pay good money to keep those offline. I only work in PR and am active in Facebook, Twitter, and blogging to ensure there is lots of other content related to me that hopefully will show up in earlier search results than the juicy stuff. So far, I'm damn successful. I have my privacy, as long as you don't click past page two in the Google search results, which is about as much as anyone could hope for in this day and age. Thank you very much 20-something could-be-a-gabillionaire Mark Zuckerburg.

 

Pingback from  Who owns social media? Are you in the ring? «  sociauxanswers

 
 
To comment on this post you have to be logged in
 

About this blog

Don't Fear the Firehose

Paul Armstrong, Kindred's Director of Social Media (http://www.kindredagency.com), on how to drink from the ever-changing social media / digital communication firehose. Paul has previous worked for MySpace Corporate Communications in Los Angeles and has devised digital strategies for Sony, Activision, Yahoo! properties amongst others.

Contributors

Paul Armstrong

Blogging for:

Don't Fear the Firehose

Member since: 06-16-2009

Last login: 03-11-2010

Total Posts: 200

Recent Posts

Archives

News

Say hi! Got a question? Always wanted to know something but been afraid to ask? Email prweekblog@gmail.com / http://paularmstrong.extendr.com /

Syndication

ADVERTISING